Dog Sniff & Missouri Law

   

Is smell probable cause in Missouri ?

Police officers in Missouri are allowed to use dog sniffs to locate illegal narcotics. Such canines can be trained to locate a specific illegal substance or multiple types of drugs. Searching using sniff dogs in Missouri follows particular rules that police officers must observe when bringing a sniffing dog at the scene.

General rule

The Fourth Amendment safeguards people from unreasonable searches and seizures. But according to the Supreme Court, using sniff dogs during a police stop does not violate the Fourth Amendment.

The Supreme Court, in the case of Illinois v. Caballes, ruled that police officers do not require reasonable suspicion to use dog sniffs during a legal traffic stop. In this case, Roy Caballes was pulled over for speeding. The defendant was subsequently arrested for marijuana trafficking after a sniff dog was brought to the scene and alerted his vehicle. The Illinois Supreme Court ruled that the police did not have a probable cause for arrest beyond speeding, and as such, the sniff was unreasonable.

The United States Supreme Court, however, overruled the decision. The Supreme Court stated that the police did not require reasonable suspicion to use a sniffer dog since the suspect was under a legitimate traffic stop.

Exceptions for using dog sniffs for searches in Missouri

Conducting searches using sniff dogs under Missouri laws has to follow some rules. Below are the rules police officers must follow when they bring a sniff dog to a scene:

(i) Reason for a stop

It all begins with a traffic stop. Police officers must have a reasonable suspicion that you have violated the law before they can stop you.

Any traffic stop without a valid reason or probable cause is illegal. All evidence, including narcotics discovered by a sniff dog, that has been obtained from an unlawful stop will not be admissible in court.

((ii) Duration of a traffic stop

Under Missouri law, a person may not be delayed in order for a sniff dog to be brought to the scene after the time for a traffic stop has expired. This means that if by the time a police officer stops you and finishes writing you a ticket, a sniff dog has not arrived at the scene, then you shall not be made to wait for the canine to arrive.

Also, the dog cannot continue sniffing after all the stop-related activities have finished. Any searches conducted after the expiry of the legitimate stop period cannot be admissible.

(iii) Probable cause

If a police officer detains you further without any probable cause, you have a right to ask the police officer if you can leave. If the police officer declines and holds you until the sniff dog arrives, you can refuse to consent to any searches. Opening the car for the sniff dog or giving your car keys to the office means you have agreed to the search.

If a court determines that there was no probable cause for delayed detention, then both the evidence and the detention will be deemed illegal. Your defense counsel should file a motion to suppress the evidence. If the evidence is declared inadmissible by the court, then you will weaken the prosecutor’s case.

The law, however, states that if a police officer develops probable cause for a crime after a traffic stop, then the officer can detain you for a longer time as may be defined by Missouri law. The evidence obtained from such delayed detention will still be admissible in court.

Drug convictions can have severe implications. If you are facing drug charges that have resulted from searches using dog sniffs in Missouri, you need to consult a criminal defense lawyer.

 

The Sixth Amendment and Eye Witness Identification

   

The Sixth Amendment and Eye Witness Identification

The procedures of witness identification face many constitutional challenges. The challenges to these procedures are focused on the provisions of the Sixth amendment below.
The Sixth Amendment to the U.S. reads in part; ”In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right… to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor, and to have the Assistance of Counsel for his defense”.

… Continue reading

Alibi Defense in Missouri

   

Alibi Defense

An alibi is a defense in criminal cases whereby a defendant demonstrates that he or she was somewhere else other than the scene of the crime at the time the alleged crime took place. In an alibi, a defendant is simply arguing that it is impossible for him or her to have committed the crime because they were at a different place at the time the crime was supposedly committed. A successful alibi rules out the defendant as the perpetrator of the offense

… Continue reading

THE CRIMINAL DEFENSE OF SELF-DEFENSE IN MISSOURI

   

Self-defense is a criminal defense that can be raised by criminal defendants who inflict serious harm on another person and they believe that they were justified in doing so. This defense can be raised in crimes such as murder, assault, battery and others where the accused responded to the threat of force or violence from the victim. While Missouri laws prohibit the use of force and violence against other persons, they equally allow individuals to use reasonable and proportionate force to protect themselves from imminent harm. Therefore, inflicting serious harm or even killing an assailant may not be considered a criminal act when the defendant reasonably believes that his or her life is at stake.

… Continue reading

Steps to get your Missouri driver’s license back after Alcohol Related Suspension

   

Alcohol Related Suspension

A person whose driver’s license is suspended by the Missouri Department of Revenue may have his or her driving privileges reinstated after the suspension period is served. Under section 302.281 (4) of Missouri laws, there are specific steps that must be completed in order to get a suspended driver’s license back. The requirements may vary based on the nature of the offense and the kind of suspension in effect. Typically, offenses that are deemed greater or severe will have stricter requirements. The following are the steps to follow

… Continue reading

RECEIVING STOLEN PROPERTY

   

Missouri statutes state that it’s an offense to hinder another person’s legal ownership of his own goods in the event that one receives the goods that he or she knows has been stolen or even thinks that the property has been stolen (Lippman & Mathew, 2010). The basis of any prosecution is that one had knowledge or believe that the goods that he or she received were stolen. If he or she has a trail of being in possession of stolen property in more than one occurrence. If one has been in a similar form of transaction in a year prior, then that means he had knowledge of the illegal transaction.

… Continue reading

Right to Speedy Trial in Missouri

   

Right to Speedy Trial in Missouri

The right to a speedy trial ensures that the state brings an individual to trial among bound points in time. There are completely different points in time supported federal law and state law. If the applicable point in time passes, the litigator could assert that his or her right to a speedy trial has been denied which the criminal charges ought to be fired. in addition to guaranteeing the correct to associate degree lawyer, the Sixth change to the U.S. Constitution guarantees a criminal litigator the correct to a speedy trial by associate degree “impartial jury.” this suggests that a criminal litigator should be dropped at trial for his or her alleged crimes among a fairly short time once arrest, which before being condemned of most crimes, the litigator includes a constitutional right to be tried by a jury, that should notice the litigator guilty “beyond an inexpensive doubt.”

… Continue reading

Prior and Persistent Law Offenders in Missouri | 2026 Guide

   

Prior and Persistent Law Offenders in Missouri

Missouri is among the states in the U.S. that have adopted special sentencing guidelines for prior and persistent law offenders. Under Missouri laws, a prior offender is a person who has been found guilty of one offense on a separate occasion from the present offense for which the person is being charged. A persistent offender is a person who has been found guilty of two or more offenses on separate occasions from the present offense for which the person is charged; OR a person who has been found guilty of offenses including assault of a law enforcement officer in the second degree, second degree assault, and involuntary manslaughter, and the person has also been proven to be a prior offender. The conviction(s) does not have to be a Missouri state conviction, but rather could be a federal conviction or a conviction from another state.

… Continue reading

Sentencing Guidelines In Missouri

   

The Missouri Department of Justice in collaboration with the Missouri Sentencing Advisory Commission has established a well-defined set of sentencing guidelines that govern the imposition of minimum and maximum punishments for different crimes while considering the facts and circumstances of individual cases. These guidelines propose the appropriate sentence disposition and the range within which an authorized sentence can be set.

… Continue reading

Coercion Defense In Criminal Law

   

A successful coercion defense requires that the defendant’s fear be reasonable and related to him/her committing the crime. A Missouri court will look at the evidence provided and give an objective ruling. Such a verdict demands that if any other person were in a similar situation to that of the defendant ought to feel the same amount of fear to necessitate the criminal act.

… Continue reading

SENTENCING GUIDELINES IN MISSOURI

   

Missouri Prison Sentencing Guidelines

The Missouri Department of Justice in collaboration with the Missouri Sentencing Advisory Commission has established a well-defined set of sentencing guidelines that govern the imposition of minimum and maximum punishments for different crimes while considering the facts and circumstances of individual cases.  These guidelines propose the appropriate sentence disposition and the range within which an authorized sentence can be set. 

… Continue reading

RECEIVING STOLEN PROPERTY

   

WHAT DOES MISSOURI CLASSIFY AS RECEIVING STOLEN PROPERTY?

Missouri statutes states that it’s an offense to hinder another person’s legal ownership of his own goods in the event that one receives the goods that he or she knows has been stolen or even thinks that the property has been stolen

… Continue reading

Classes Of Felonies In Missouri And Their Punishment Range

   

Classes Of Felonies In Missouri And Their Punishment Range

The classes of felonies in Missouri and their punishment range

According to Missouri legal statutes, felonies are crimes that are considered to be more serious in nature, typically punishable by imprisonment for at least one year. Missouri criminal law classifies felonies into five categories, ranging from Class A to Class E, with Class A being the most serious crimes and Class E felonies being the least serious crimes. Each class of felonies has a different set of offenses and punishment range.

During my visit to the US, I was extra cautious about its state laws as a tourist. Missouri’s felony classification reads like a descending ladder — Class A at the top with life-changing stakes and Class E, the least severe, still not to be taken lightly. I was mighty impressed.” – Shailen Vandeyar, Funnel Teacher

Class A Felonies 

This category is reserved for the most serious and violent crimes against another person. Examples of offenses that fall under this category include, but are not limited to, murder, treason, first-degree kidnapping, forcible rape of a child under 12 years, first-degree robbery, causing a catastrophe, abuse or neglect of a child resulting in death, serious sex crimes, serious assaults, and some drug crimes.  A Class A felony carries a sentence of 10 to 30 years in prison or life imprisonment.  Persistent sexual offenders convicted of Class A felonies more than once get a life sentence without the option of probation or parole.

Class B Felonies

While they may carry a lesser sentence than Class A felonies depending on the nature and severity of the offense, Class B felonies are also very serious crimes that carry harsh penalties.

Examples of Class B felonies in Missouri include, but are not limited to, voluntary manslaughter, first-degree abortion, first-degree burglary, first-degree domestic assault, first-degree assault, bus hijacking, second-degree drug trafficking, and promoting prostitution in the first degree. Class B felonies are punishable by imprisonment for not less than 5 years and not exceeding 15 years.

Class C Felonies

Class C felonies mostly involve theft and property crimes but may also involve a crime against another person. 

Examples of Class B felonies include involuntary manslaughter, fraud, identity theft, resisting arrest, third degree domestic assault, failure to make report of drug transfer, use of child in sexual performance, and many more. A Class C felony conviction carries a prison sentence of not less than 3 years and not exceeding 10 years. A court may order a person convicted of a Class C felony to pay a fine of up to $10,000 or twice the amount of financial gain to the offender.

Class D Felonies

Class D felonies are considered less serious offenses within Missouri statutes. Examples of Class C felonies include Class I election offenses, passing a bad check, unlawful use of a weapon, fraud, second-degree domestic assault, unauthorized practice of medicine or surgery, aggravated DWI, sale of drugs without a license, and many more. A Class D felony is punishable by up to 7 years in prison.   Class D felonies are punishable by a fine of up to $10,000 or twice the amount of financial gain to the offender. The court can give probation for most class D felonies when the offenders have served a certain percentage of the total sentence. However, there are offenses such as DWI and child abuse for which offenders are not eligible for probation or parole.

Class E Felonies

These are considered the least serious offenses within Missouri statutes and typically carry the least severe range of punishment available under the statute. Class E felonies include providing false information, insurance fraud, deceptive business practice, third-degree assault, breach of confidentiality regarding taxes, motor fuel tax evasion, invasion of privacy, abandonment of a corpse, and many more. A Class E felony is punishable by a prison sentence of up to four years and a fine of up to $10,000 or twice the amount of financial gain to the offender.

A felony charge in Missouri is simply bad news. If convicted, one could be facing up to 30 years in prison or a life sentence. It takes a skilled criminal defense lawyer to guide and represent a person facing felony charges for the best outcome possible.

Contact US

The Grand Jury in Missouri and How it Works

   

Court Room Grand Jury Missouri

Missouri is one of the several states in the U.S. that use a grand jury system to determine criminal indictments. Basically, a grand jury is a group of citizens selected to sit on a jury to investigate possible criminal conduct and determine whether charges should be brought against a potential defendant. Missouri laws empower the grand jury to conduct legal proceedings and decide if there is probable cause to believe a person has committed a crime and should be indicted. However, it should be noted that it’s not the responsibility of the grand jury to find guilt or propose penalties to a party. The grand jury in Missouri plays a key role in running a valuable test for prosecutors in making a decision whether to press charges or not

… Continue reading

Missouri Supreme Court Update

   

Missouri Law

The Supreme Court affirmed without reaching the issue of whether Gant or Carrawell required the suppression of the evidence, holding that any error was not prejudicial because other unchallenged evidence fully supported the judgment reached by the circuit court. While Mr. Hughes has standing to challenge the seizure of the bag he admitted belonged to him, this Court needn’t reach the problem whether or not Gant or Carrawell needed the motion to suppress to be sustained as a result of no prejudice resulted from it being overruled during this court-tried case. Decent extra proof to support the conviction was introduced by the defense in its interrogation of 1 of the impressive officers and thru the defense’s stipulation to the admission of the laboratory report showing the confiscated things were hard drug and cocaine.

… Continue reading